It is obvious that libraries and their resources are becoming obsolete in the face of Internet superstars like Google. People rarely take notice, nor do they really care, because searching the web seems so much easier and much more efficient. However, as Steven J. Bell points out, by using the scholarly databases that libraries provide, more pertinent high quality information can be accessed without having to search through some of the more “junky” alternatives offered by search engines.
Bell uses the term “infobesity” to refer to the utilization of the overwhelming elements of big search engines like Google. “Infodieting” gives a nice metaphor for using the library’s vast collection of information. If the library offers a much savvier agglomeration, then why aren’t we using it?! Well that is simple. Library databases are hard to use. It can be difficult to coin Boolean terms and navigate through all the different sources of information. I should know, I just completed the database activity!
Anyhow, Bell’s solution is to make library databases user-friendly to encourage usage. Of course, there are objections, for instance, that this new alternative would cheapen the hard earned purpose of heavy research, because “research is a process of discovery.” Well, as a college student, I can say that I am in a constant process of discovery and by enabling my ability to search through valid, scholarly sources that are credible with ease, my process of discovery is ONLY expounding in various directions.
Reading this article is very relevant to our library research class, UNCW campus, and the whole breach between the library and overall population in general. If I had not decided to take LIB 103, I would not have the slightest idea what a database is, or a scholarly journal; nor would I be able to navigate through the selection of hardcover book titles. I would even be bold enough to say that about eighty percent of our campus is in the same boat as I was. The library offers so many sources of rich information and by keeping it locked up within the confines of nit picky search techniques, it is of no use. It is better accept change (for the radical librarians, professors, etc) and embrace a newer system. Otherwise, we will stick with the outdated methods, and do an injustice to a limitless supply of information that could spark infinite possibilities.